All the consumer grid batteries and many of the commercial versions tout
their ability to save money by charging at night when electricity rates
are low and discharge during the day to avoid using grid electricity
when the rates are high. And this makes sense.
But we need to be careful. If the grid is ever maintained in such a way
to make it more robust, or if there become enough grid battery
installations, then this price disparity between night and day will be
lessened. And consequently, using this disparity in price between night
and day to pay off the battery installation would take longer.
There is no doubt that grid batteries are a good idea. If nothing else,
when solar and wind power become cheap enough to compete with coal and
nuclear we'll need a battery to make them useful. And even if the
disparity between night and day is lessened, with an inexpensive enough
battery even a longer pay-off time will still make financial sense.
There are also people that say rate-shifting is a regulation problem and
not an engineering problem. And if that's true it means that rate
shifting could become fiscally unviable at the stroke of a pen. And this
is true to some extent. But even if the regulations could change
overnight, a lot more would have to change before it was politically
possible. And it would not make grid batteries a bad idea in the context
of renewable energy or simply as peace of mind that comes with a
battery backup.
No comments :
Post a Comment